Posts: 5,310
Threads: 68
Thanks Received: 1,178 in 1,044 posts
Thanks Given: 194
Joined: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Reputation:
148
The Doblo is one ugly beeyatch.
______________________
Current:
2017 B9 1.6 BlueHDi Van
______________________
Previous:
2012 B9 1.6 HDi Van
2008 M59 1.6 HDi Van
2003 M59 1.9D Van
•
Posts: 171
Threads: 13
Thanks Received: 14 in 14 posts
Thanks Given: 7
Joined: Sep 2020
Location: Germany
Reputation:
8
I'd hesitate for sure buying an ugly car but then the rational part of my brain would say you'd hardly ever see the outside of it anyway. I'd either be in the car or it would be parked in a garage or such like.
I would welcome though it may be easier to spot it in a supermarket car park.
Now a 2019 K9 1.2 petrol.
Before a 2010 B9 1.6 HDi diesel.
•
Posts: 5,310
Threads: 68
Thanks Received: 1,178 in 1,044 posts
Thanks Given: 194
Joined: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Reputation:
148
19-06-2022, 08:44 AM
(This post was last modified: 19-06-2022, 08:47 AM by Zion.)
Not mine Mark, I have to like the look of it - can't live with an ugly car. That new one linked, is not what I think of in a Doblo but the hideous previous models.
______________________
Current:
2017 B9 1.6 BlueHDi Van
______________________
Previous:
2012 B9 1.6 HDi Van
2008 M59 1.6 HDi Van
2003 M59 1.9D Van
•
Posts: 551
Threads: 35
Thanks Received: 58 in 55 posts
Thanks Given: 118
Joined: Mar 2021
Location: England
Reputation:
6
The new Doblo looks OK to me - I'd rank the front-end treatment of the van above the Vauxhall version. It has the same headlight design as the Citroen and Toyota versions, though the Fiat sort of looks like its mouth has been sewn up. Lol. I agree about the older Doblos though - not the most elegant on the roads.
Work van: 2020 1.5 BlueHDi 100 Enterprise Berlingo
Spare van: 2001 1.9 600d Berlingo
•