24-02-2026, 11:00 AM
I know there has been a fair bit of discussion about this already and my 73 plate Berlingo XTR is not classified as an MPV even though these vehicle are commonly used as taxis.
I was told by the dealer at the time of purchase that this was because Stelantis had lost type approval when they ceased manufacture of ICE versions. When they built some more due to demand, they added the bulkhead and tagged it onto the existing type approval for the Berlingo van. Simply a cost cutting exercise and nothing more.
I recently looked on the DVLA site and found a classification for a 'Car derived van' (CDV) Now on the face of it, that would appear to be the best of a bad bunch in describing what I have. However, even that classification isnt correct for the Berlingo because mine also has rear seats, seat belts and fully opening rear windows. So on that basis, mine is more closely a car or MPV than it is a CDV. There are plenty of 'vans' out there, some of which have a bulkhead and some of which dont but ithey are all classed as vans! The really odd thing is that my V5 records my vehicle as a 'Van with windows'!! Surely that cant be correct? Even my insurance company (SAGA) is confused by all of this and contacted me with their concerns when an internal audit showed my vehicle described as a van, and that they do not insure vans! The bulkhead is another can of worms, it is fairly common for me to remove the bulkhead in order to carry longer loads to the tip etc as its only a few bolts and not part of the structure of the vehicle. I dont class that as a modification but others may disagree. If the bulkead is the only 'reason' my vehicle is classified as a van will my insurance be valid when it is in, or out, or not at all? They said I will continue to be insured for the remainder of this period but could not say beyond that. i would be interested to know if the owners of any similar age / model to mine have the same classification. What a total mess!
I was told by the dealer at the time of purchase that this was because Stelantis had lost type approval when they ceased manufacture of ICE versions. When they built some more due to demand, they added the bulkhead and tagged it onto the existing type approval for the Berlingo van. Simply a cost cutting exercise and nothing more.
I recently looked on the DVLA site and found a classification for a 'Car derived van' (CDV) Now on the face of it, that would appear to be the best of a bad bunch in describing what I have. However, even that classification isnt correct for the Berlingo because mine also has rear seats, seat belts and fully opening rear windows. So on that basis, mine is more closely a car or MPV than it is a CDV. There are plenty of 'vans' out there, some of which have a bulkhead and some of which dont but ithey are all classed as vans! The really odd thing is that my V5 records my vehicle as a 'Van with windows'!! Surely that cant be correct? Even my insurance company (SAGA) is confused by all of this and contacted me with their concerns when an internal audit showed my vehicle described as a van, and that they do not insure vans! The bulkhead is another can of worms, it is fairly common for me to remove the bulkhead in order to carry longer loads to the tip etc as its only a few bolts and not part of the structure of the vehicle. I dont class that as a modification but others may disagree. If the bulkead is the only 'reason' my vehicle is classified as a van will my insurance be valid when it is in, or out, or not at all? They said I will continue to be insured for the remainder of this period but could not say beyond that. i would be interested to know if the owners of any similar age / model to mine have the same classification. What a total mess!


![[-]](http://berlingoforum.b-cdn.net/images/collapse.png)


