Posts: 22
Threads: 11
Thanks Received: 0 in 0 posts
Thanks Given: 1
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Reputation:
0
Hi everyone, just joined the forum.I have had 3 previous Berlingos, the last sadly written off when someone hit me in the rear a few weeks ago. Can anyone give me an opinion on the new shape berlingo, I have seen a 58 model 1.,6 HDI 75HP for sale at a good price. Is this engine OK ?, is there anything else I should look out for. What kind of mpg can I expect ?, any advice would be much appreciated before I dive into the unknown.
Many thanks.
Badger
•
Posts: 3,669
Threads: 20
Thanks Received: 729 in 655 posts
Thanks Given: 2,126
Joined: Apr 2011
Location: Monmouth
Reputation:
18
Be certain it has a documented S/H.Oil changes are very important.
Have it checked by a pro.Good luck.
Strawberry flavoured windows
•
Posts: 61
Threads: 21
Thanks Received: 4 in 4 posts
Thanks Given: 16
Joined: Jan 2013
Location: newcastle
Reputation:
0
Yes documented service history is a must...ive heard the 1.6 hdi turbos are a bit soft if not looked after...also check all electrics work...
Just what i was told when i bought mine.good luck
•
Posts: 1,764
Threads: 78
Thanks Received: 363 in 306 posts
Thanks Given: 159
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Herefordshire
Reputation:
9
As a current MK3 owner and a previous Mk2 owner I would suggest that a late MK2 is a safer bet than an early MK3.
The 1.6 is similar on both and when well cared for is superb - when not its a minefield - search the forum for info on Turbo issues.
Ive had 60mpg from these engines in Mk3's (driving very carefully of course)
Uneven rear tyre wear,and clattery supension is common on early MK3's
As ron / scotty say ,a FSH is vital.
It is on my to do list.
But not right at the top
2012 Hdi75 van
•
Posts: 1,764
Threads: 78
Thanks Received: 363 in 306 posts
Thanks Given: 159
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Herefordshire
Reputation:
9
Unless your getting it dirt cheap then I would be inclined to let it go.
The engines are not like ordinary traditional ones.
When things go wrong they can be expensive and without names in that book you cannot be 100% sure if its been done right ( or at all...)
Also being a company car I would reckon its been thrashed and thrashed when cold (turbo)
Sorry to be negative but you really have to be careful -trust no-one!
It is on my to do list.
But not right at the top
2012 Hdi75 van
The following 1 user says Thank You to evdama for this post:1 user says Thank You to evdama for this post
• ron
Posts: 3,669
Threads: 20
Thanks Received: 729 in 655 posts
Thanks Given: 2,126
Joined: Apr 2011
Location: Monmouth
Reputation:
18
I have to agree with my cynical friend.A certain service history is a must.
Strawberry flavoured windows
•
Posts: 1,906
Threads: 50
Thanks Received: 475 in 420 posts
Thanks Given: 743
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: Aylesford, Kent
Reputation:
3
13-03-2013, 03:46 PM
(This post was last modified: 13-03-2013, 03:47 PM by Ol'Jeffers.)
.....and so is a stamped up service record....It's very easy to say that the vehicle has been serviced.
Did it get absolutely the correct oil at the right intervals? ESSENTIAL on these engines! Who knows? There'll be no receipts!
I don't think I'd be tempted by that one.....but I don't much like the Mk.3....too big. IMHO the Mk.2 is
a better vehicle.
The Older I get the Better I Was!
•