Posts: 57
Threads: 18
Thanks Received: 1 in 1 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2011
Location: UK
Reputation:
0
Hi, I have a 2003 Berlingo with the 1.9D engine.
I recently drove a 100mile journey fully loaded with five people, camping gear, food and drink and all cooking equiptment. I had luggage on the roof rack as well. I cruised at 70 - 80mph when I could. I calculated a 30mpg average consumption which I thought was pretty poor.
On the return journey (along the exact same route) We were one person less, no food or drink and all the luggage inside the car and the roof bars removed. I drove slower never exceeding 70mph and often doing less. This time I calculated 68mpg! which is obviously fantastic.
Is this possible or have I messed up my calculations somehow?
•
Posts: 850
Threads: 52
Thanks Received: 82 in 67 posts
Thanks Given: 9
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: Kent
Reputation:
0
Did the person you left behind consume ALL the food and drink?
I think that 30mpg could be realistic given the weight, roof rack, speed and so on. I am more surprised by the 68mpg figure but not being a 1.9D owner I am ready to be corrected!
2005 Berlingo Multispace 1.6i Desire (Iron Grey)
If everything seems to be going well, you have obviously overlooked something.
•
Posts: 1,709
Threads: 52
Thanks Received: 316 in 279 posts
Thanks Given: 87
Joined: Oct 2010
Location: Switzerland
Reputation:
5
Well the power required to overcome drag increases as the cube of the velocity so the luggage on the roof could account for that. Check
this out.
Tom
2010 Berlingo Multispace HDi 110 with FAP. Persamos green.
•
Posts: 398
Threads: 51
Thanks Received: 35 in 32 posts
Thanks Given: 3
Joined: Feb 2011
Location:
Reputation:
0
obvious.
biggest factor is less speed
next roof bars off
then less weight
•
Posts: 57
Threads: 18
Thanks Received: 1 in 1 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2011
Location: UK
Reputation:
0
It's the 68mpg calculation that has prompted me to start this thread.
30mpg is disappointing but realistic.
Has anyone else achieved these kind of figures with the 1.9D?
A comment on drag, the flat back of a Berlingo causes big problems, there's a vacuum constantly pulling the car back. It's a shame, although practical for loading, it's awful for high speed economy.
•
Posts: 1,445
Threads: 63
Thanks Received: 269 in 217 posts
Thanks Given: 410
Joined: Nov 2010
Location: Stoke on Trent
Reputation:
3
06-06-2011, 03:15 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-06-2011, 03:18 PM by andy-womble.)
(06-06-2011, 02:51 PM)MattFreeman Wrote: A comment on drag, the flat back of a Berlingo causes big problems, there's a vacuum constantly pulling the car back. It's a shame, although practical for loading, it's awful for high speed economy.
I've noticed that. All the dust and airborne crap gets sucked into this vacuum and sticks to the rear door like the proverbial to a blanket......
(06-06-2011, 02:31 PM)Chris Wrote: Did the person you left behind consume ALL the food and drink?
Were you in convoy with Martin j90xxxl, bet he ate all the pies :lol::lol::lol::lol:
Berlingo Multispace 2.0HDI '54 reg Mediterranean Blue
•
Posts: 1,548
Threads: 101
Thanks Received: 276 in 220 posts
Thanks Given: 384
Joined: Apr 2011
Location: Newcastle -u-Lyme, Staffordshire
Reputation:
0
Oi! Womble! NO!
People in houses made of breakable materials should not project objects of great mass.
Mmm. Pies. Back in a bit...:chef:
•
Posts: 1,099
Threads: 80
Thanks Received: 96 in 87 posts
Thanks Given: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
Location: North Wales, by the Sea but in the Mountains
Reputation:
0
maybe you were eager to get away so right foot was down more, coming back not so keen so right foot slightly lighter???? Traffic on motorways, stop starts, supermarker fuel, or garage fuel, plus all the factors as stated. Wind. Did you inflate tyres to compensate for extra weight going? more people = bulging tyres....so so many varients.
2010 artic silver VTR with EXTRAS.......
unny:
•
Posts: 476
Threads: 17
Thanks Received: 117 in 92 posts
Thanks Given: 153
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Rayleigh Essex UK
Reputation:
0
I have this engine........ My advice, DO NOT do over 70mph fully loaded or otherwise...... drinks like a fish!! over 3000 rpm anyway... no other solution I'm afraid
Adam..2003..1.9D..LX..Silver Crew Cab Van.....
If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried.
•
Posts: 498
Threads: 30
Thanks Received: 99 in 44 posts
Thanks Given: 40
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: Southend - On - Sea
Reputation:
4
I have the 1.9D but I have no idea how to work out the MPG lol, sorry can't be of help, I can say I done £135 in two weeks of 5 days going about 55 miles a day, just don't know what it works out at and I just had myself in the car
Lliam
70 plate Berlingo
•