Posts: 2,548
Threads: 52
Thanks Received: 668 in 567 posts
Thanks Given: 145
Joined: Aug 2012
Location: Wales
Reputation:
43
I was called by a neighbour yesterday who was checking his valve clearances prior to timing belt etc change and had a surprise at the results.
Vehicle had covered 100 k miles.
Every exhaust valve clearance was pretty much spot on at 0.30 mm
Every inlet valve was too tight at 0.038 mm against the required 0.15 mm
( 1.5 thou instead of 6 thou )
I have to say I was surprised at the results and double checked the cam position and the feeler gauges, my neighbour was also surprised hence his asking for a second opinion.......
Naturally all will be rectified but I just thought I'd share the story.
•
Posts: 800
Threads: 12
Thanks Received: 384 in 273 posts
Thanks Given: 16
Joined: Dec 2012
Location: uk
Reputation:
36
I have found that between @ 140k &180k that they close up sufficiently for the engine not to start from cold, makes a huge difference once they are correct again.
My C15 DW8 engine, is ready for its second adjustment at 265000 miles, as the starting issue is becoming noticeable .
•
Posts: 254
Threads: 38
Thanks Received: 31 in 27 posts
Thanks Given: 69
Joined: Dec 2011
Location: Surrey, UK
Reputation:
1
(14-03-2014, 09:27 AM)Lighty Wrote: I have found that between @ 140k &180k that they close up sufficiently for the engine not to start from cold, makes a huge difference once they are correct again.
My C15 DW8 engine, is ready for its second adjustment at 265000 miles, as the starting issue is becoming noticeable .
Are you the lighty from the c15 forum?
Reading this
http://visaforum.freeforums.org/c15-fuel...-t935.html was what persuaded to finally de-EGR my van, and knowing that people had just ripped the flap out the EGR made life much easier. I love a bit of brute force.
MOT passed with no problems, so thanks to you and the other contributors. I never bothered joining just to post asking for pics and to say thanks
2004 1.9D Multispace/Budget crew cab work van!
•
Posts: 254
Threads: 38
Thanks Received: 31 in 27 posts
Thanks Given: 69
Joined: Dec 2011
Location: Surrey, UK
Reputation:
1
(14-03-2014, 08:47 AM)geoff Wrote: Every inlet valve was too tight at 0.038 mm against the required 0.15 mm
( 1.5 thou instead of 6 thou )
Speaking of EGR's, who wants to bet that bloody thing is responsible for wearing the inlet valves while the exhaust valves remain spot on?
2004 1.9D Multispace/Budget crew cab work van!
•
Posts: 2,548
Threads: 52
Thanks Received: 668 in 567 posts
Thanks Given: 145
Joined: Aug 2012
Location: Wales
Reputation:
43
EGR's ... quite possibly as valve recession is more usually associated with exhaust valves.
•
Posts: 476
Threads: 17
Thanks Received: 117 in 92 posts
Thanks Given: 153
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Rayleigh Essex UK
Reputation:
0
14-03-2014, 11:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 14-03-2014, 11:35 PM by adam3rdcanvey.)
Is true in my opinion. A friend of mine has a dw8 partner 04 reg... EGR disabled from new and crankcase breather vented to fresh air instead of back into the manifold, this means no sticky gunk in no's 1 and 2 cylinders either. Has remained within tolerances and has done 156000 miles now. EGR is a short term solution causing long term engine damage
Adam..2003..1.9D..LX..Silver Crew Cab Van.....
If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried.
•