Posts: 236
Threads: 43
Thanks Received: 42 in 37 posts
Thanks Given: 3
Joined: Feb 2012
Location: hampshire
Reputation:
1
hi ..ive a 2004 2.0 hdi desire..running 15 standard wheel,the drive is nice and smooth and it handles ok. ive looked at a set of 17in alloys with 205.45.17in tyres. id like them to smarting up my car but a freind reconds that they will downgrade the ride. ive fitted bigger wheels to other cars in the past and i must say the drive wasnt as good (following white lines ect ) i know there are a lot of guys on here that are running larger some a lot larger alloys .whats your veiws on the larger wheels. thanks.
•
Posts: 293
Threads: 30
Thanks Received: 55 in 42 posts
Thanks Given: 104
Joined: Sep 2011
Location: Gloucestershire
Reputation:
2
17-05-2014, 07:31 PM
(This post was last modified: 17-05-2014, 07:37 PM by pidgeonpost.)
I know that the idea of alloys is to 'reduce the unsprung weight' and all that, and maybe they look 'cool' too, but personally I find them a pain. They have come ready fitted to a few of the cars I've owned, but unless you're an enthusiastic cleaner and polisher (I'm not), then give 'em a couple of years of muck and salt and they don't look so good. Perhaps you've answered your own question when you mention your previous experience of fitting big wheels? Then again, I'm a crabby old git. Our Blingo has standard steels and plastic trims - still looking good after 3 winters! :o)
'56 Multispace 1.6HDi - Iron Grey
•
Posts: 2,786
Threads: 23
Thanks Received: 501 in 458 posts
Thanks Given: 50
Joined: Sep 2013
Location: Gloucestershire uk
Reputation:
29
If you like the alloy's fit them it will not make the much difference to the ride just remember the tyre's need a load rating of at least 93 :thumbsup:
•
Posts: 319
Threads: 44
Thanks Received: 67 in 56 posts
Thanks Given: 9
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Reputation:
10
17-05-2014, 10:50 PM
(This post was last modified: 17-05-2014, 10:51 PM by Kokain.)
Ron is right a lot of aftermarket steels are pretty s**t when it comes to weight. Not to mention it's ridiculously hard to buy what you want as soon as you mention width and offset. This is where banded steels come in.
•
Posts: 236
Threads: 43
Thanks Received: 42 in 37 posts
Thanks Given: 3
Joined: Feb 2012
Location: hampshire
Reputation:
1
thanks for your input lads i think ill stick to my steels.
•
Posts: 293
Threads: 30
Thanks Received: 55 in 42 posts
Thanks Given: 104
Joined: Sep 2011
Location: Gloucestershire
Reputation:
2
(19-05-2014, 04:53 PM)landcrab Wrote: thanks for your input lads i think ill stick to my steels.
Looking on the bright side, you can always spend the loot on something else! :thumbsup:
'56 Multispace 1.6HDi - Iron Grey
•
Posts: 96
Threads: 8
Thanks Received: 5 in 5 posts
Thanks Given: 17
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: kangaroo central
Reputation:
0
I Have upgraded from 175/65:14 steels to 205/40:17 recently and find the steering sharper braking better and mad looks but the ride a little worse..
It's the trade off for sure... A. Lower side profile/wall means less flex.
.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
•